|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW1] Using Cache appliances to seperate HTTP flow of content from FW-1
I can't speak about the CacheFlow. Although I do have a supplier that sells it. However, you may want to check StoneSoft (StoneBeat) cache server solution. This may be of interest to you. Cheers, Marc ----- Original Message ----- From: "Conrad Chircop" <[email protected]> To: "Firewall-1 Mailing List (E-mail)" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 9:21 AM Subject: [FW1] Using Cache appliances to seperate HTTP flow of content from FW-1 > > > > We are considering to seperate HTTP content by using a cache server > solution in parallel to > FW-1 with a proprietary OS such as CacheFlow - thus we would be decreasing > the traffic through it. > > Has anybody tried out a similar solution & if yes, what is your opinion of > it ? > > Thanks in advance > > Best Regards > > Conrad Chircop > > > > > ============================================================================ ==== > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ============================================================================ ==== > ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
