[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] Using Cache appliances to seperate HTTP flow of content from FW-1
Conrad, At my previos job, we had a CacheFlow Appliance parrellel with the firewall. The appliance was in transparent mode, and dual homed. This device did everything the liturature and sales staff promised. The support was exceptional. The reporting features were good, and the administration was well documented. Overall I would put a Cacheflow box back in my network, if our policy allowed "free" browsing. Currenly only select individuals are allow so the justification is not there for me. Thanks, Phillip --------------------------------------------------------- Phillilp Blatzheim ATOFINA Petrochemicals, Inc. Information Technology -- Telecom 15710 JFK Blvd. Houston, TX 77032 [email protected] Phone:Fax:--------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Conrad Chircop [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 8:21 AM To: Firewall-1 Mailing List (E-mail) Subject: [FW1] Using Cache appliances to seperate HTTP flow of content from FW-1 We are considering to seperate HTTP content by using a cache server solution in parallel to FW-1 with a proprietary OS such as CacheFlow - thus we would be decreasing the traffic through it. Has anybody tried out a similar solution & if yes, what is your opinion of it ? Thanks in advance Best Regards Conrad Chircop ============================================================================ ==== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ============================================================================ ==== ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|