[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FW1] PIX vs. CheckPoint

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FW1] PIX vs. CheckPoint
From: "Dave Dunaway (ncc0296)" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 08:59:31 -0500
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from [email protected] on Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 12:46:08PM -0000
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i



So run the Nokia boxes. The IPSO Operating system on there is a strip down
secured FreeBSD and you can install ssh on there, which, correct me if I'm
wrong, you can't on a PIX. The Nokia boxes are quite nicely secured.

Now if they can only make it 1U :)

> Technically PIX is a better firewall solution as it does not inherit any
> underlying OS weakness, however it is much more complex to configure and the
> reporting is not as good.

-- 
Dave Dunaway [[email protected]]
Systems Administrator, AT&T Canada, IES
tel:, fax:================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [FW1] PIX vs. CheckPoint
  - From: Jason Costomiris <[email protected]>
- RE: [FW1] PIX vs. CheckPoint
  - From: "corne" <[email protected]>

References:
- RE: [FW1] PIX vs. CheckPoint
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: [FW1] Unknow message on firwall
Next by Date: [FW1] Re: your mail
Prev by thread: RE: [FW1] PIX vs. CheckPoint
Next by thread: Re: [FW1] PIX vs. CheckPoint
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread