NETWORK PRESENCE ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT
 


Search
display results
words begin  exact words  any words part 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [FW1] Boson FW-1 Admnistrator Exam



This can be read different way.
1- The Firewall software is so good which it will take care of all security
issues
   regardless of OS type
2- It is not necessary, but it can be a recommendation

I guess if you have rule like
any firewall (any except fw protocols)  drop
Then it really doesn't matter how secure your OS is. of course, it doesn't
hurt
to apply the basic OS security practices.

NA

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
Lance Spitzner
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 9:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [FW1] Boson FW-1 Admnistrator Exam



Recently,  I was asked a question about a "Boson"
FW-1 Administrator exam.  I have no idea what this
exam is, nor who sponsors it.  However, if the
material quouted below is true, then this question
greatly disturbs me.  I wanted to know if anyone
else has ran into this.

--- snip snip ---

I have always thought that it is necessary to harden the OS for the firewall
server. However, I was doing the Boson Checkpoint FW-1 Administrator
practice exams when I came across this question:

Question: Why is it unnecessary for Firewall-1 to harden the OS?

Answer: Firewalls that do not analyze the packet until it gets to the
application layer need to protect themselves from the lower layer attacks.
Firewall-1 protects itself by analyzing all the layers of the packet.
Therefore it is unncessary for the administrator to harden the OS for
Firewall-1 server.

Is this true????

--- snip snip ---

This is absolutely NOT true.  If an exam is making these assumptions,
then it shows that the author has a total lack of security knowledge.
No firewall is impervious to vulnerabilities, Bugtraq demonstrates this
again and again.  Also, base OS armoring protects the firewall against
rulebase or administrative misconfigurations.  I highly recommend OS
armoring for all firewalls, regardless of the vendor.  Part of security
is reducing risk at all levels.

--
Lance Spitzner
http://project.honeynet.org




============================================================================
====
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
============================================================================
====



================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================



 
----------------------------------

ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT SITE MAP LEGAL
   All contents © 2004 Network Presence, LLC. All rights reserved.