[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] Using Nokia IP650 as Enterprise firewall??
Thanks for your response. Does StoneBeat offer load balancing also? -raymond At 09:34 PM 1/23/01 -0500, you wrote: >As for the StoneBeat solution, StoneBeat offers and excellent HA solution. >The only problem in this environment is that StoneBeat is not supported for >the Nokia platform. You would need to remain with Sun to use the StoneBeat >product. > >If you are interested in StoneBeat and need more information, let me know >and I would be happy to provide it. > >Rick McMaster >Sr. Network Security Engineer >ePlus Technology >http://www.eplus.com >Nasdaq: PLUS > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 5:49 PM >To: Raymond N >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [FW1] Using Nokia IP650 as Enterprise firewall?? > > > > > >Raymond: > > The Nokia IP650 will definitely handle your load. The IP440 should also >be >able to handle your load but am not as familiar with the specs on this >machine >(as we use a pair of Nokia IP650s here). On each of our Nokia IP650s we have >256MB of memory and a PII processor (448MHz). The IP650s will definitely be >able >to handle your load and then some. > > As far as VRRP is concerned.... VRRP was developed by Nokia and as far >as I >know is only implemented on Nokia equipment. It could be possible that it >will >work on other platforms but I do not currently know of any yet and I have >never >heard of anyone implementing it on Sun equipment. > > As far as an HA environment in regards to Sun equipment is concerned I >have >heard quite a few people use the Stonebeat Full Cluster product line. But as >I >have never used this product I am not very familiar with it. Maybe someone >from >this list could comment? > > As far as a CheckPoint HA setup, since v4.1 SP2? CheckPoint has >encorporated some HA functionality into there code but I have not taken a >look >at it. Since we use VRRP here I have not really looked into this. > > Now, my opinion is rather biased but the Nokia platforms are a very >solid >box. They are very easy to set up out of the box and are a very solid/stable >platform. Since you are familiar with Unix (being that your current machine >is >an Ultra-2 running Solaris 2.x) the jump to a Nokia platform running IPSO >(based >on FreeBSD) would be rather minor. > > We basically made the jump that you are thinking about now a couple of >years back and the jump was NOT as traumatic as we had originally >anticipated. > > Let me know if you would like more input. > > > > > > > >Raymond N <[email protected]> on 01/23/2001 02:32:00 PM > > > > To: [email protected] > > cc: (bcc: James E Clukey/Rush/RSH) > > > > Subject [FW1] Using Nokia IP650 as Enterprise > : firewall?? > > > > > > > > >Hi there, > >We are currently using Firewall-1 on a Sun Ultra 2 machine. We have about >2000 workstations and servers behind it. During the peak period of the >day, we have about 1000 to 1500 connection in the Firewall-1 's Active >session table. We use both static NAT and hide NAT. So far, the firewall >machine is doing well and we doesn't notice any load problem. > >Now, my question is if you think the Nokia IP650 (or the IP440) would have >sufficient (CPU, memory, etc.) capacity to replace the Sun Ultra 2 and >handle the current load? Better? > >Another question is if the VRRP is only available for the Nokia setup, and >not for the Sun Ultra 2 machine? I guess my question is if the Checkpoint >VRRP solution are built at the Firewall-1 software or at the hardware >(Nokia) platform. > > >Thanks in advance. > >-raymond > > > >============================================================================ >==== > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html >============================================================================ >==== > > > > > >============================================================================ >==== > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html >============================================================================ >==== > > ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|