RE: [FW1] local.arp file and Windows 2000

[Nate Roberts <NRoberts@FW1-NOSPAMrhinosystems.com>]

Does anyone know of anymore "gotcha" w/ W2K and Checkpoint 2K SP3?

-----Original Message-----
From: J Michael Graham [mailto:jmgraham@midsouth.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 10:26 PM
To: Checkpoint FW-1 List
Subject: Re: [FW1] local.arp file and Windows 2000

Local.arp plain doesn't work with Win2K. I haven't tried out FW-1 on win2k yet, but I would assume that you should build routing rules instead, as its routing service is very robust (at least, very robust for Windows). As a gateway router or VPN/NAT gateway, 2K does quite well, with a clearly defined and cleanly running rulebase. If anyone has any experience using 2K's IPSecPol filters for packet control before FW-1's rulebase sees them, I'd be quite interested to hear about it.

Graham

-----Original Message-----

From: owner-fw-1-mailinglist@lists.us.checkpoint.com [mailto:owner-fw-1-mailinglist@lists.us.checkpoint.com]On Behalf Of Nate Roberts

Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 3:54 PM

To: 'fw-1-mailinglist@lists.us.checkpoint.com'

Subject: [FW1] local.arp file and Windows 2000

 

Does any one know of any issues with using the local.arp file (Checkpoint

2000 sp3) with Windows 2000 Server

-Nate

 

================================================================================

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at

http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html

================================================================================