| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [FW1] Nokia IP650 - HA vs VRRP
Raymond:
Yes they are different. Think of it this way; The Nokia's are routers,
therefore VRRP will fail-over what the router does. Whereas the CheckPoint stuff
(of which is new for 4.1 SPx) will failover what CheckPoint does (services,
connections, etc.) And you can use both at the same time. You can use VRRP to
failover your Nokia's (whether it be due to a hardware failure or whether for
maintenance or whatever) and use the CheckPoint stuff to failover over things
such as VPNs.
One question though, why would you not want to use the Nokia's to failover
your VPNs?
Raymond N <[email protected]> on 01/26/2001 07:31:15 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: (bcc: James E Clukey/Rush/RSH)
Subject [FW1] Nokia IP650 - HA vs VRRP
:
Hi there,
When reading Checkpoint html pages, there is a "High Availability Module"
for fail-over. On Nokia appliance, it also has VRRP for fail-over. Are
they different? Or, I need both of them to get fail-over function?
Thanks.
p.s. We don't plan to use the Nokia for any VPN service.
-raymond
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
|
|
