Search

	display results
words begin exact words any words part

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[FW-1] websense versus surfcontrol

To: [email protected]
Subject: [FW-1] websense versus surfcontrol
From: Daniel Morone <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 10:12:01 -0400
Comments: To: [email protected]
Reply-to: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 <[email protected]>
Sender: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 <[email protected]>

I can't find an objective comparision between WebSense and SurfControl.   Could you please share your experience good or bad with either of these products as a UFP server?   Also, anybody done this with HA?

We currently implement a filter at our proxy server and are interested in moving to the firewall/UFP.   It appears the top two contenders are WebSense and SurfControl.   We may continue doing reporting off the proxy logs as that's where authentication occurs.

Looking for comments about:
- list quality
- administration
- performance
- stability
- support


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [FW-1] websense versus surfcontrol
  - From: Lars Troen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [FW-1] domain logon through secure remote
Next by Date: Re: [FW-1] [FW1] Content Filtering
Previous by thread: [FW-1] simple question
Next by thread: Re: [FW-1] websense versus surfcontrol
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread