[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW-1]
The
Contivity switches have a "branch tunnel" option. We have a couple of
Checkpoint fw's and a couple of Contivity switches, but we aren't tunnelling
between them as such. It sounds like you're looking at implementing
site-to-site vpn tunnel, so the above option may work for you. As far as I
know, the Contivity units do standard IPsec/IKE, you will probably just
need to experiment with them.
Hi there, We're currently in the throws of implementing FW-1, however, our web site is hosted by our MSP and we wanted to set up a permanent VPN to them (firewall to firewall VPN). Our MSP uses a Nortel 'hardware box' and we want to use FW-1 on an Intel server. Our MSP insists that FW-1 > Nortel VPNs won't work, even though I'm under the impression that nortel firewalls use FW-1!! Can anyone verify this? If this is the case, can anyone suggest away of keeping our intel server and still creating a VPN with the MSP? If this is proven TO WORK can someone send me some supporting docs? Cheers, Stuart C
|