|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW1] why not a bridge?
[email protected] wrote: > I hate to say this, but... try thinking outside the box! Just because the > bridge you bought ten years ago doesn't have the functionallity that I am > suggesting doesn't mean that it shouldn't be done! Or tried atleast. > > I am not mistaking anything, I just think that it would be more secure if > the firewall was transparent. Checkout Sunscreen EFS3.x from Sun. It can work in router and stealth modes. In stealth mode it is invisible. You just drop it into a subnet. For me the EFS3.x is a much more secure firewall than fw-1 with most of the features provided by fw-1. I admin both fw-1 and Sunscreens and this is just my opinion. I'm in no way connected with Sun. ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
