[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FW1] NAT

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FW1] NAT
From: Ed Rolison <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 14:54:27 +0000 (GMT)
Reply-To: Ed Rolison <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]



>I have a IP 330 appliance and I have 192.168.9.X configured on one interface
>and 192.168.15.X configured on the other.  Do I have to add a nat rule to
>allow these two subnets to talk to each other or do they talk to each other
>by default since they are behind the same gateway that is protecting them??
>I thought that the external interface was the place where packets were
>dropped or accepted.

This is what routing tables are all about. And packet forwarding.
TCP/IP Network Administration by O'Reilly is quite a good book.

--
Ed Rolison
Systems Admin
ER706-RIPE
[email protected]



================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Prev by Date: [FW1] NAT
Next by Date: RE: [FW1] FW-1 One External Interface- NAT to several public addresses
Prev by thread: [FW1] NAT
Next by thread: RE: [FW1] NAT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread